Viktorova E.Yu. Transdisciplinary Study of Hedging Strategy in Evaluative Academic Discourse
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2024.1.1
Elena Yu. Viktorova
Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Professor, Department of Romance-Germanic Philology and Translation, Saratov State University
Astrakhanskaya St, 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-1897
Abstract. The article presents the research into hedges and hedging strategy realization in evaluative academic genres viewed from a transdisciplinary perspective. To this end, 64 dissertation reviews written by Russian male and female scholars in humanities (linguistics, literature studies, history) and sciences (physics, chemistry, medicine) were analyzed. Hedging is understood as a system of linguistic means, which perform a mitigating function associated with expressing vagueness, uncertainty, skepticism and doubt. Perlocutionary effects of hedging are connected with reducing the illocutionary strength of the writer's claims or risks of opposition, face saving, positive and negative politeness. The following classification of hedges is proposed: self-mentions, mitigation hedges, hedged performatives, evaluations of propositions and vagueness hedges. The results of the comparative quantitative and qualitative analyses reveal that hedging strategy is determined by a number of discursive and personal factors such as sphere of communication, speech genre, gender and professional experience of the writer. In dissertation reviews hedges show high frequency of occurrence, which can be explained by the public nature of reviews, their potential traumatic effect on the reader, the existing requirements for scientific data presentation in a tentative and indeterminate way, as well as high academic competence of reviewers. The research proves that in humanities hedges demonstrate a higher frequency rate than in sciences. At the same time, male reviewers reveal higher hedging frequency than female reviewers.
Key words: mitigation, hedging, hedge, discourse marker, speech genre, academic discourse, dissertation review, Russian language.
Citation. Viktorova E.Yu. Transdisciplinary Study of Hedging Strategy in Evaluative Academic Discourse. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], 2024, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 5-17. (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2024.1.1
Transdisciplinary Study of Hedging Strategy in Evaluative Academic Discourse by Viktorova E.Yu. is licensed under CC BY 4.0
 1_Viktorova.pdfURL: https://l.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/2895 | 537 Downloads |