Pavlova E.B., Valeeva N.G. Toxic Communication Zones and Emotive Markers in the Russian-Language Work Environment

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.2.2

Elena B. Pavlova

Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)

Miklukho-Maklaya St, 6, 117198 Moscow, Russia

pavlova-eb@rudn.ruThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5817-3463

Nailya G. Valeeva

Candidate of Sciences (Pedagogy), Head of Department of Foreign Languages, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)

Miklukho-Maklaya St, 6, 117198 Moscow, Russia

valeeva-ng@rudn.ruThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4971-4533


Abstract. The paper addresses the problems of toxic communications in the workplace and considers lexical and grammatical means of expressing emotions. The material for the study was former workers' comments and anonymous questionnaires completed by current employees of Russian enterprises. Based on empirical data processed under Fisher's angular transformation method, which enabled highly accurate comparison of small samples, three toxic communication zones in industry were identified: the zones of toxic bosses, toxic management, and toxic workers. The authors performed a Likert scale survey of executives, managers, and workers. The results of single-factor and two-factor analysis of variance helped us to establish the relation between toxic communication and so-called toxicity focuses, that is, standard topics which are constantly in the centre of destructive communications in the workplace. The paper determines lexical and grammatical means of expressing emotions which are emotive markers of toxic communication (affectives and connotatives). It shows that abusive words and phrases, zoolexics, vernacular and slang vocabulary, colloquial emotionally colored vocabulary, and phraseological units are equally relevant for all three zones of toxic communication zones. Quantitative analysis of the identified emotive markers in terms of their structural and morphological characteristics revealed the abundance of interjections, nouns, adjectives, and adverbs of degree and intensity.

Key words: toxic communication, toxic communication zones, work communication, markers of toxicity, affectives, connotatives, lexical and grammatical means of expressing emotions.

Citation. Pavlova E.B., Valeeva N.G. Toxic Communication Zones and Emotive Markers in the Russian-Language Work Environment. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], 2023, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 23-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.2.2

Creative Commons License
Toxic Communication Zones and Emotive Markers in the Russian-Language Work Environment by Pavlova E.B., Valeeva N.G. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Attachments:
Download this file (2_Pavlova_Valeeva.pmd.pdf) 2_Pavlova_Valeeva.pmd.pdf
URL: https://l.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/component/attachments/download/2750
340 Downloads