Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2. Языкознание1998-99112409-197910.15688/jvolsu2.2023.1.14OtherЭмотивная прагматика популяризации: контекстуализация и читательский интерес [На англ. яз.]Emotive Pragmatics of Popularisation Discourse: The Impact of Contextualisation on Reader’s InterestТрущелёвПавел НиколаевичTrushchelevPavel N.0000-0003-0810-2434Herzen University (Saint Petersburg, Russia)Российский государственный педагогический университет им. А.И. Герцена (Санкт-Петербург, Россия)110420232211731853009202205122022https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/CC BY 4.0

В статье обсуждается один из аспектов эмоциогенной коммуникации – эмоциональное воздействие, или эмотивная прагматика. С опорой на положения социопрагматической концепции эмоций описана четырехчастная модель эмоциогенной коммуникации. Выделены языковые приемы контекстуализации, которые используют авторы научно-популярных текстов для пробуждения читательского интереса. Для определения эмоциогенного потенциала приемов проведена серия экспериментов с участием 400 студентов бакалавриата. Материалом экспериментального исследования послужили тексты из двух книг по культуре речи – справочной и научно-популярной. Испытуемые читали два текста из разных книг и с помощью биполярных шкал обозначали уровень своего устойчивого интереса к чтению и предмету, а также выражали свое субъективное отношение к содержанию текстов (эмоциональный интерес, новизна, слож- ность, понятность, оригинальность). В результате статистического анализа полученных данных доказан эмоциогенный потенциал контекстуализации. Установлено, что приемы контекстуализации положительно воз действуют на читательский интерес, увеличивая личную значимость (релевантность) содержания текста и нарушая ожидания читателя относительно формы текста (способов представления знаний). Результаты исследования свидетельствуют об адекватности прагматической модели эмоциогенной коммуникации, разработанной в рамках лингвистической теории эмоций.

The paper adheres to the pragmatic approach to emotion processes and focuses on emotion- evocative communication. Its goal is to investigate the impact of contextualisation techniques, which employed by popularisation discourse to induce readers’ interest. The research is carried out in two ways, discourse-pragmatic and experimental. First, by adopting the sociopragmatic view of emotions and using methods of discourse analysis, the paper fleshes out a model of emotion-evocative communication, outlines contextualisation techniques, and introduces text materials. Second, by representing the experimental study, the paper assesses the interest-evoking effect of contextualisation. The experimental study involved 400 undergraduate students. We employed the scaling method (7-point bipolar scales) to measure participants’ attitude to generalised and contextualised text passages. The data analysis applied the Wilcoxon test, the Kolmogorov – Smirnov test, Spearman’s correlation coefficient, the linear regression, and the explanatory factor analysis. The comparing tests reveal that contextualisation promotes reader’s interest in the popularisation text. The findings suggest that contextualisation techniques make the text content more relevant to the reader. Personal relevance – as a kind of mediator – causes interest responses. Beyond that, it was found that that reader’s expectations about text strategies to presents knowledge construct interest- evocative communication. The findings demonstrate how communicative variables combine into the model of emotion-evocative communication.

эмотивная прагматикаэмоциогенная коммуникацияинтереспопуляризацияконтекстуализацияemotive pragmaticsemotion-evocative communicationinterestpopularizationcontextualisationИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке Российского фонда фундаментальных исследований (РФФИ), проект № 20-012-00284.The study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project no. 20-012-00284Alba-Juez L., 2021. Affect and Emotion. Haugh M., Kádár D.Z., Terkourafi M., eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 340-362. DOI: 10.1017/9781108954105.019Auer P., 2009. Context and Contextualisation. Verschueren J., Östman J.-O., eds. Key Notions for Pragmatics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin, pp. 86-101.Bakhtawer N., Ghulam F., Dur e N., 2021. Strategies Used by Public Primary School Teachers for Enhancing Students’ Curiosity in Science. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 93-101. DOI: 10.26710/jafee.v7i1.1568Bayer M., Ruthmann K., Schacht A., 2017. The Impact of Personal Relevance on Emotion Processing: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials and Pupillary Responses. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, vol. 12, iss. 9, pp. 14701479. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsx075Bohn-Gettler C.M., Kaakinen J., 2022. Introduction to the Special Issue on Emotions in Reading, Learning, and Communication. Discourse Processes, vol. 59, iss. 1-2, pp. 1-12. DOI: 10.1080/ 0163853X.2021.1899369Bondi M., 2018. Dialogicity in Written Language Use: Variation Across Expert Action Games. Weigand E., Kecskes I., eds. From Pragmatics to Dialogue. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin, pp. 137-170. DOI: 10.1075/ds.31.08bonBowcher W., 2019. Context and Register. Thompson G., Bowcher W., Fontaine L., Schönthal D., eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,pp. 142-170.DOI:10.1017/9781316337936.008Burdelski M., 2020. Emotion and Affect in Language Socialization. Pritzker S.E., Fenigsen J., Wilce J.M., eds. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Emotion. London, New York, Routledge, pp. 28- 48. DOI: 10.4324/9780367855093-3Calsamiglia H., 2003. Popularization Discourse. Discourse Studies, vol. 5, iss. 2, pp. 139-146. DOI: 10.1177/146144560300500230.Calsamiglia H., van Dijk T.A., 2004. Popularization Discourse and Knowledge About the Genome. Discourse and Society, vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 369389. DOI: 10.1177/0957926504043705Connelly D.A., 2011. Applying Silvia’s Model of Interest to Academic Text: Is There a Third Appraisal? Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 21, iss. 5, pp. 624-628. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.007ConnollyJ.H., 2014. The Contextual Component Within a Dynamic Implementation of the FDG Model: Structure and Interaction. Pragmatics, vol. 24, iss. 2, pp. 229-248. DOI: 10.1075/prag.24.2.03conDe Beaugrande R., 1982. The Story of Grammar and the Grammar of Stories. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 6, iss. 5-6, pp. 383-422. DOI: 10.1016/03782166(82)90014-5De Saussure L., Wharton T., 2020. Relevance, Effects and Affect. International Review of Pragmatics, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 183-205. DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01202001Firth J.R., 1957. Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London, New York, Toronto, Oxford University Press. 233 p.Gotti M., 2014. Reformulation and Recontextualization in Popularization Discourse. Ibérica, iss. 27, pp. 15-34.Greenaway K.H., Kalokerinos E.K., Williams L.A., 2018. Context is Everything (In Emotion Research). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 12, iss. 6, art. e12393. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12393Griner L.A., Smith C.A., 2000. Contributions of Motivational Orientation to Appraisal and Emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 26, iss. 6, pp. 727-720. DOI: 10.1177/0146167200268007Gumperz J.J., 1992. Contextualization Revisited. Auer A., Luzio A.D., eds. The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin, pp. 39-53. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.22. 04gumHayakawa S.I., 1977. Language in Thought and Action. London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd. 307 p.Hidi S., Baird W., 1988. Strategies for Increasing Text- Based Interest and Students’ Recall of Expository Texts. Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 465-483. DOI: 10.2307/747644Hyland K., 2009. Academic Discourse. English in a Global Context. London, New York, Continuum. 256 p.Hyland K., 2014. Dialogue, Communityand Persuasion in Research Writing. Gil-Salom L., Soler- Monreal C., eds. Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin, pp. 1-20. DOI: 10.1075/ ds.23.02hylHyland K., 2019. Foreword: Bringing in the Reader. Sancho Guinda C., ed. Engagement in Professional Genres: Deference and Disclosure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamin, pp. xixiv. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.301.00hylLepper C., Stang J., McElvany N., 2021. Gender Differences in Text-Based Interest: Text Characteristics as Underlying Variables. Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 57, iss. 2, pp. 537-554. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.420Makkonen-Craig H., 2014. Aspects of Dialogicity: Exploring Dynamic Interrelations in Written Discourse. Karlsson A.-M., ed. Analysing Text and Talk. Uppsala, Uppsala universitet, pp. 99-120.Markey A., Loewenstein G., 2014. Curiosity. Pekrun R., Linnenbrink-Garcia L., eds. International Handbook of Emotions in Education. London, NewYork, Routledge, pp. 228-245. DOI: 10.4324/ 9780203148211-18Metcalfe J., Riedlinger M., 2019. Public Understanding of Science: Popularisation, Perceptions and Publics. Gruber D.R., Olman L.C., eds. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Science. London, New York, Routledge, pp. 32- 46. DOI: 10.4324/9781351207836-4Mikk J., 2000. Textbook: Research and Writing. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, Peter Lang. 426 p.Moisander J.K., Hirsto H., Fahy K., 2016. Emotions in Institutional Work: A Discursive Perspective. Organization Studies, vol. 37, iss. 7, pp. 963-990. DOI: 10.1177/0170840615613377Mur-Dueñas P., 2021. Engagement Markers in Research Project Websites: Promoting Interactivity and Dialogicity. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, vol. 57, iss. 4, pp. 655-676. DOI: 10.1515/psicl-2021-0023Pham L.N., Tin T.B., 2022. Exploring Learner Interest in Relation to Humanistic Language Teaching Materials: ACase from Vietnam. System, vol. 105, iss. 5,art. 102731.DOI:10.1016/j.system.2022.102731Pinoliad E., 2021. Contextualization in Teaching Short Stories: Students’ Interest and Comprehension. Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31-55. DOI: 10.47631/mejress.v2i1.167Piotrovskaya L.A., Trushchelev P.N., 2021. Linguistic Approach to Study of Strategies for Increasing Text-Based Interest. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, vol. 108, pp. 276-283. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.05. 02.33Piotrovskaya L.A., Trushchelev P.N., 2022. Communicating Recipient’s Emotions: Text- Triggered Interest. Training, Language and Culture, vol. 6, iss. 1, pp. 60-74. DOI: 10.22363/ 2521-442X-2022-6-1-60-74Qin W., Uccelli P., 2019. Metadiscourse: Variation Across Communicative Contexts. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 139, pp. 22-39. DOI: 10.1016/ j.pragma.2018.10.004Renninger K.A., Bachrach J.E., Hidi S.E., 2019. Triggering and Maintaining Interest in Early Phases of Interest Development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, vol. 23, art. 100260. DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.11.007Renninger K.A., Hidi S.E., 2016. The Power of Interest for Motivation and Engagement. New York, London, Routledge. 177 p.Renninger K.A., Hidi S.E., 2022. Interest Development, Self-Related Information Processing, and Practice. Theory into Practice, vol. 61, iss. 1, pp. 23-34. DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2021.1932159Richards I.A., 2001. Principles of Literary Criticism. London, New York, Routledge. 290 p.Sadoski M., Goetz E.T., Rodriguez M., 2000. Engaging Texts: Effectsof Concretenesson Comprehensibility, Interest, and Recall in Four Text Types. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 92, iss. 1, pp. 85-95. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.85Sadoski M., Paivio A., 2013. Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing. London, New York, Routledge. 165 p.Schank R.C., 1979. Interestingness: Controlling Inferences. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 273-297. DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(79)90009-2Schiefele U., Schaffner E., Möller J., Wigfield A., 2012. Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Behavior and Competence. Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 47, iss. 4, pp. 427-463. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.030Silvia P.J., 2006. Exploring the Psychology of Interest. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 263 p.Silvia P.J., 2017. Curiosity. O’Keefe P.A., Harackiewicz J.M., eds. The Science of Interest. New York, Springer, pp. 97-106. DOI: 10.1007/ 978-3-319-55509-6_5Scott C., 2021. You Won’t Believe What’s in This Paper! Clickbait, Relevance and the Curiosity Gap. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 175, pp. 53-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.023Shakhovsky V.I., 2008. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya emotsiy [The Linguistic Theory of Emotions]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ. 416 p.Shin J., Chang Yu., Kim Yo., 2016. Effects of Expository- Text Structures on Text-Based Interest, Comprehension, and Memory. The SNU Journal of Education Research, vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 39-57.Trushchelev P.N., 2022a. Funktsii voprosov v uchebnom tekste (na materiale shkolnykh uchebnikov) [Interrogative Mood in Expository Texts from School Textbooks]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Cherepovets State University Bulletin], iss. 4, pp. 114-130. DOI: 10.23859/1994- 0637-2022-4-109-11Trushchelev P., 2022b. Problemnoe izlozhenie v uchebnom tekste i chitatelskiy interes [Problem- Based Exposition in Textbook and Reader’s Interest]. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy forum [Siberian Philological Forum], iss. 3, pp. 152-166. DOI: 10.25146/2587-7844-2022-20-3-132Van Dijk T.A., 2014. Discourse and Knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 400 p.Van Dijk T.A., 2015. Context. Tracy K., ed. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-11. DOI: 10.1002/9781118611463/wbielsi056Wade S.E., 2001. Research on Importance and Interest: Implications for Curriculum Development and Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, vol. 13, iss. 3, pp. 243-261. DOI: 10.1023/ A:1016623806093Wetherell M., 2012. Affect and Emotion. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, SAGE. 182 p.Wharton T., Bonard C., Dukes D., Sander D., Oswald S., 2021. Relevance and Emotion. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 181, pp. 259-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.001Wharton T., De Saussure L., 2022. The Pragmatics of Emotion, Argument and Conflict. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, vol. 46, iss. 1, pp. 664-680. DOI: 10.1515/9783110347524-032Wiltschko M., 2021. The Grammar of Interactional Language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 265 p.Rosenthal D.E., 2016a. Govorite i pishite po-russki pravilno [Speak and Write Russian Correctly]. Moscow, Airis-Press Publ. 256 p.Rosenthal D.E., 2016b. Spravochnik po pravopisaniyu i literaturnoi pravke [A Guide to Spelling and Editing]. Moscow, Airis-Press Publ. 368 p.