<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.4/JATS-archive-oasis-article1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2. Языкознание</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1998-9911</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2409-1979</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.4.6</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Other</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Дихотомизация как основа исследования позитивной коммуникации в межкультурном контексте [На англ. яз.]</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Dichotomization as a Basis of Positive Communication Analysis in an Intercultural Context</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Леонтович</surname><given-names>Ольга Аркадьевна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Leontovich</surname><given-names>Olga A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-0972-4609</contrib-id></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Volgograd State Socio-Pedagogical University (Volgograd, Russia)</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Волгоградский государственный социально-педагогический университет (Волгоград, Россия)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Pushkin State Russian Language Institute (Moscow, Russia)</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Государственный институт русского языка им. А.С. Пушкина (Москва, Россия)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2023-10-26"><day>26</day><month>10</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>76</fpage><lpage>85</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-05-21"><day>21</day><month>05</month><year>2023</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2023-06-21"><day>21</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:title="CC BY 4.0"><ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p xml:lang="ru">CC BY 4.0</license-p></license></permissions><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Цель исследования – рассмотреть конститутивные признаки и механизмы позитивной коммуникации и их соотношение с вежливостью. Методика исследования включает позитивный дискурс-анализ (Positive Discourse Analysis), дихотомическое деление и конверсационный анализ. В качестве материала выступает книга Н. Фёдоровой «The Family» (1940). Полученные результаты показывают, что базовой для изучаемой проблемы является дихотомия позитив – негатив, отражающая противоречие между добром и злом, этичным и неэтичным поведением. Противопоставленность аттракции и дезаттракции соотносится с восприятием собеседника как привлекательного либо неприятного. Дихотомия инициативность – пассивность отражает готовность / неготовность к интеракции, в то время как вовлеченность – отчужденность ассоциируется со степенью участия в делах собеседника. В дихотомии альтероцентризм – эгоцентризм реализуется ориентация на себя или другого. Контраст между социальной поддержкой и социальной индифферентностью связан с эмпатией либо с равнодушием к проблемам адресата. Конструктивная коммуникация как созидательное поведение, направленное на разрешение проблем в интеракции, противопоставлена деструктивной коммуникации, исходом которой становится ухудшение либо разрыв взаимоотношений. Одна из важнейших составляющих коммуникации – это конгруэнтность, то есть аутентичность личности, соответствие между внутренней сущностью человека и коммуникативными проявлениями, обращенными к внешнему миру. Позитивная коммуникация непосредственно связана с вежливостью, но не тождественна ей. В отличие от позитивной коммуникации, вежливость, не будучи самоцелью, выступает как инструмент, используемый для гладкого, бесконфликтного и гармоничного общения.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="summary"><p>Theaim of the paper is to investigate the constituent features and mechanisms of positive communication and reveal their correlation with politeness. The study is based on a mixed-method research design including Positive Discourse Analysis, dichotomic division and conversational analysis, and is carried out on the material of the book The Family by Nina Fedorova (1940). The results indicate that the dichotomy positive vs negative attitude is basic for the study and implements the contrast between good and evil, ethical and unethical behaviour. The juxtaposition of attraction vs disattraction refers to the perception of an interlocutor as likable or unlikable. The dichotomy activism vs passivism reflects the willingness or unwillingness to interact, while communication involvement vs alienation is associated with the communicator’s engagement in the interlocutor’s affairs. The juxtaposition of alterocentrism vs egocentrism indicates whether a communicator is focused on one’s own or other people’s interests. The dichotomy social support vs social indifference is a reflection of empathy or its absence. In the dichotomy constructive vs destructive communication creative behaviour aimed at resolving a difficult situation is opposed to destructive actions leading to the deterioration or break-up of a relationship. One of the most important constituents of positive communication is congruency which denotes authenticity and correspondence of the person’s genuine inner self with the image addressed to the outer world. Positive communication is intrinsically linked with, though not identical to, politeness. The latter does not act as an aim per se, but is rather a tool employed to make an interaction conflict-free, smooth and harmonious.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>позитивная коммуникация</kwd><kwd>вежливость</kwd><kwd>дихотомия</kwd><kwd>аттрактивность</kwd><kwd>вовлеченность в общение</kwd><kwd>альтероцентризм</kwd><kwd>социальная поддержка</kwd><kwd>конструктивная коммуникация</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>positive communication</kwd><kwd>politeness</kwd><kwd>dichotomies</kwd><kwd>attraction</kwd><kwd>communication involvement</kwd><kwd>alterocentrism</kwd><kwd>social support</kwd><kwd>constructive communication</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 23-18-00238, https:// rscf.ru/project/23-18-00238/</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The reported study was funded by RSF, Project 23-18-00238, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-18-00238/</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Alpatov V.M., 2018. Vezhlivost i etiket (na russkom i yaponskom materiale) [Politeness and Etiquette (On the Material of Russian and Japanese)]. Sharonov I.A., ed. Vezhlivost i antivezhlivost v yazyke i kommunikatsii: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Politeness and Antipoliteness in Language and Communication. Proceedings of an International Conference]. Moscow, Politicheskaya entsiklopediya Publ., pp. 7-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Bieri J., 1955. Cognitive Complexity-Simplicity and Predictive Behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, no. 51, pp. 263-268. DOI: 10.1037/h0043308</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Bragina N.G., 2018. Vezhlivost kak nevezhlivost: na styke raznykh kulturnykh norm i pravil [Рoliteness as Impoliteness: On the Junction of the Different Cultural Norms and Rules]. Sharonov I.A., ed. Vezhlivost i antivezhlivost v yazyke i kommunikatsii: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Politeness and Antipoliteness in Language and Communication. Proceedings of an International Conference]. Moscow, Polit. entsikl. Publ., pp. 38-44. EDN: YQVLMD</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Brown P., Levinson S.,1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 345 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Culpeper J., 1996. Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 349-367. DOI: 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 EDN: AMICXH</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Culpeper J., 2005. Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35-72. DOI: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Ilyinova E.Yu., 2013. Pragmatika tolerantnosti i takta v sovremennoy publichnoy kommunikatsii [Pragmatics of Tolerance and Tact in Modern Public Communication]. Panchenko N.N., ed. Chelovek v kommunikatsii: ot kategorizatsii emotsiy k emotivnoy lingvistike [Personality in Communication: From Categorisation of Emotions to Emotive Linguistics]. Volgograd, Volgograd. nauch. izd-vo, pp. 206-215.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Larina T.V., 2009. Kategoriya vezhlivosti i stil kommunikatsii: Sopostavlenie angliyskikh i russkikh lingvokulturnykh traditsiy [Politeness and Communicative Styles: Comparative Analysis of English and Russian Language and Culture Traditions]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur. 512 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Leech G., Larina T., 2014. Politeness: West and East. Russian Journal of Linguistics, no 4, pp. 9-34. EDN: TFLGPX</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Leontovich O.A., ed., 2020. Pozitivnaya kommunikatsiya [Positive Communication]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ. 296 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Martin J.R., 1999. Grace: The Logogenesis of Freedom. Discourse Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29-56. DOI: 10.1177/1461445699001001003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Martin J., 2004. Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, no. 49, pp. 179-200.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Mirivel J.C., 2014. The Art of Positive Communication: Theory and Practice. New York, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, Oxford, Wien. 190 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Novosyolov M.M., 2010. Dikhotomiya [Dichotomy]. Stepin V.S., Gusejnov A.A., Semigin G.Yu., eds. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. V 4 t. T. 1. A-D [New Philosophical Encyclopedia. In 4 Vols. Vol. 1. A-D ]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., pp. 674-675.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Panchenko N.N., 2010. Dostovernost kak kommunikativnaya kategoriya [Veracity as a Communicative Category]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ. 322 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Ponton D.M., 2023. The meaning of Welcome. Positive Migration Discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 134-151. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-33319 EDN: ATIPRQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Rhee S., 2023. Politeness and Impoliteness in Social Network Service Communication in Korea. Russian Journal of Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 39-66. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-32031 EDN: GEEYRR</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Shakhovsky V.I., 2016. Dissonans ekologichnosti v kommunikativnom kruge: chelovek, yazyk, emotsii [Dissonance of Ecology in a Communicative Circle: People, Language, Emotions]. Volgograd, Polikarpov I. L. Publ. 504 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Sharonov I.A., ed., 2018. Vezhlivost i antivezhlivost v yazyke i kommunikatsii: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Politeness and Antipoliteness in Language and Communication. Proceedings of an International Conference]. Moscow, Polit. entsikl. Publ. 318 p. EDN: VODKOE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Socha T.J., Pitts M.J., eds., 2012. The Positive Side of Interpersonal Communication. New York, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, Oxford, Peter Lang Publishing Inc. 355 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Stibbe, A., 2017. Positive Discourse Analysis: Rethinking Human Ecological Relationships. The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. Routledge, London. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/81669939.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Takhtarova S.S., 2009. Mitigatsiya kak kommunikativnaya kategoriya: kognitivno-diskursivnyy i etnokulturnyy aspekty [Mitigation as a Communicative Category: Cognitive, Discursive and Ethnocultural Aspects]. Volgograd, Volgograd. nauch. izd-vo. 408 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Velбzquez J.A.M., Pulido C.M., eds., 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Positive Communication. Contributions of an Emerging Community of Research on Communication for Happiness and Social Change. New York, London, Routledge. 434 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Vorkachev S.G., 2004. Schastye kak lingvokulturnyy contsept [Happiness as a Linguacultural Concept]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ. 192 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Vorkachev S.G., 2007. Lyubov kak lingvokulturnyj contsept [Love as a Linguacultural Concept]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ. 288 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Yan Kai, Zhang Bin, 2023. Predstavlenie o schastye v yazykovom soznanii nositeley russkoy kultury: psikholingvisticheskiy aspekt [The Concept of Happiness in the Linguistic Consciousness of Native Russian Speakers: Psycholinguistic Aspect]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznaniye [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 108-122. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.1.9 EDN: EMDMXP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Fedorova N. The Family. S.l., Little Brown, 1940. 346 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
