Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2. Языкознание1998-99112409-197910.15688/jvolsu2.2023.6.5OtherНаучная школа профессора С.П. Лопушанской: развитие теоретических подходов к исследованию современных документов [На англ. яз.]Development of Theoretical Approaches to Modern Document Studies in Linguistic School of Professor Sofiya P. LopushanskayaКосоваМарина ВладимировнаKosovaMarina V.0000-0003-2854-8759Volgograd State University (Volgograd, Russia)Волгоградский государственный университет (г. Волгоград, Россия)0303202322666790305202309102023https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/CC BY 4.0

В статье представлены основные методологические положения научной школы профессора Волгоградского государственного университета Софии Петровны Лопушанской и показано их развитие применительно к одному из научных направлений современной лингвистики – «Документный текст: история и современное состояние». Продемонстрировано, что исследование деловой коммуникации и документа как ее основного элемента – это актуальная научная задача, которая требует разноаспектного анализа языкового материала; обозначены вопросы, уже получившие лингвистическое осмысление. В рамках данного обзора описаны подходы к анализу документного текста, основанные на положениях о единстве языка и мышления, взаимодействии языковых явлений и процессов, экстралингвистической детерминированности документного текста и др., принятые в лингвистической школе Волгоградского государственного университета принципы: необходимость определения объекта исследования и его специфики; привлечение для анализа текстов различных жанров и сфер употребления; рассмотрение свойств документного текста как реализации его категорий. Представлены основные результаты изучения текста современных документов, изменяющие и дополняющие имеющиеся в лингвистике сведения о его свойствах – системности, структурности, локальности, особенностях языковой репрезентации автора и адресата. Показано, что текст документа может содержать информацию разных качественных типов, составляет элемент документной системы и коммуникативного акта, в нем находят отражение объективное и социальное пространства, образ автора объективирован разноуровневыми средствами языка, адресатность документа детерминирует его лексическую, стилевую и текстовую адаптацию. Применение этих подходов и принципов открывает новые возможности для исследования документов разных видов и особенностей документной коммуникации.

The article presents fundamental positions of the linguistic school by Sofiya P. Lopushanskaya, Professor of Volgograd State University, and describes their theoretical advancement as being applied in the discourse studies on "Document text: history and modern state". It explains that the study of business and administrative communication should be based on a clarified definition of the term document as its main constituent. The major goal of documental linguistics is to process a diverse linguistic analysis, discover objective knowledge and reason linguistic comprehension of the documental nature of communication. Within the framework of this review, some general principles of the document text analysis are presented. Firstly, they are statements on: the unity of the speech-making process approach; the interaction and coordination between language phenomena and speech production processes; extralinguistic determination of the modern document. Secondly, these statements were particularized in the linguistic school of Volgograd State University with the aim of introducing basic approaches to the study of the document text. They involve identifying the research object and its characteristics, analyzing a diverse range of texts to assess the genre and style productivity of the document text equally, and defining linguistic categories that are manifested in textual and lingual specificity. The article presents renewed facts on discursive and linguistic features of modern documents united by such text properties as consistency, structure, locality, peculiarities of the language representation of the author and addressee. It is noted that the text of the document can contain information of various qualitative types (factual, conceptual, subtextual), and it is the main constituent of the documental system and the business and administrative communication act. As the text reflects an objective and social reality, its compositional structure and semantic realization greatly depend on extralinguistic constrains. The profiles of the author (addresser) and addressee are presented as being reconstructed with the detailed observation of multi-level lingual and discursive means. The variability of the addressee profiles (the document text addressability) is presented in models of lexical, style, and text adaptation. The principles and methods of detailed description of the documet text specified in the article open up new opportunities and directions for studying document typology and distinguishing relevant features of the document communication.

документная лингвистиканаучная школасовременный документдокументная коммуникациясвойства документного текстаdocumental linguisticsresearch schoolmodern documentdocument communicationfeatures of document textBelokoneva K.A., 2011. K probleme zhanrovo-stilevoy prinadlezhnosti dokumentnogo teksta [On the Problem of Genre and Style of a Document Text]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, no. 2 (14), pp. 148-153.Belous E.S., 2010. Leksiko-semanticheskaya kharakteristika terminov upravleniya dokumentatsiey[Lexical-Semantic Characteristics of Terminologyin Documentation Management]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, no. 2 (12), pp. 13-18.Belous E.S., 2021. Terminologiya upravleniya dokumentatsiey: semantika, struktura, funktsionirovanie [Documentation Management Terminology: Semantics, Structure, Functioning]. Volgograd, VolgGTU Publ. 164 p.Buslaeva E.S., 2016. Dokumentnost kak svoystvo teksta (na primere tekstov sfery PR) [ Document Nature as a Text Feature ( Exemplified by PR Texts)]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], no. 1 (30), pp. 70-77. DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2016.1.8Bystrova А.S., 2017. Zhanrovye parametry strategii kak dokumenta dolgosrochnogo planirovaniya [Genre Parameters of Strategy as a Document of Long-Term Planning]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 199-206. DOI: https://doi. org/ 10 . 15688 /jvolsu2 . 2017.3.20Gal’perin I.R., 2004. Tekst kak obyekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as a Domain of Linguistic Research]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ. 144 p.Gorban O.A., 2019. Donosheniya i raporty donskikh kazakovvseredine XVIII v.: istochnikovedcheskiy analiz [The Donosheniya and Reports of Don Cossacks in the Mid 18th c.: Source Analysis]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations], vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 45-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/ jvolsu4.2019.4.4Gorban O.A., Ilyinova E.Yu., Kosova M.V., Sheptukhina E.M., 2016. Zhanrovye osobennosti voyskovykh gramot serediny XVIII v. (po materialam arkhivnogo fonda «Mikhaylovskiy stanichnyy ataman») [Genre Characteristics of Military Charters of the 18th c. (On Materials of the Mikhailovsky Stanitsa Ataman Archive Fund)]. Izvestiya Uralskogo federalnogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnye nauki [Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2. Humanities and Arts], vol. 18, no. 4 (157), pp. 182-199. DOI: 10.15826/izv2.2016.18.4.074Gorban O.A., Kosova M.V., Sheptukhina E.M., Dmitrieva E.G., Safonova I.A., 2020. Dokumenty Voyska Donskogo XVIII veka: lingvisticheskoe opisanie i teksty [Documents of the Don Army of the 18th Century: Linguistic Description and Texts]. Volgograd, Izd-vo VolGU. 464 p.Gorban O.A., Kosova M.V., Sheptukhina E.M., Svetlov A.V., 2022. Korpus arkhivnykh dokumentov Voyska Donskogo: problemy morfologicheskogo analiza [Corpus of the Archival Documents of the Don Cossack Army: Problems of Morphological Analysis]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2 . Yazykoznanie [ Sci en ce Journ a l of Vol gogra d St at e University. Linguistics], vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 47-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/ jvolsu2.2022.6.4GOST R 7.0.97-2016. Unifitsirovannye sistemy dokumentatsii. Unifitsirovannaya sistema organizatsionno-rasporyaditelnoy dokumentatsii. Trebovaniya k oformleniyu dokumentov [Unified Documentation Systems. The Unified System of Organizational and Administrative Documentation. Requirements for Registration of Documents], 2018. Мoscow, Standartinform Publ. 27 p.Karaban’ N.A., 2018. Soderzhanie i verbalnaya reprezentatsiya kommunikativnoy kategorii vezhlivosti (na materiale pismennykh zhanrov ofitsialno-delovogo stilya) [The Meanning and Verbal Representation of the CommunicativeCategory of Politeness (Based on Written Genres of Official-Business Style)]. Sovremennaya nauka: aktualnye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki [Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series of “Humanities”], no. 3-2, pp. 155-158.Kireeva E.Z., 2016а. «Sledy» avtora v tekste dokumenta, ili k probleme pragmaticheskogo analiza teksta [“Traces” of the Author in the Document Text, or the Problem of Pragmatic Text Analysis]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [ Sci en ce Jour n a l of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], no. 1 (30), pp. 44-52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15688/jvolsu2.2016.1.5Kireeva E.Z., 2016b. Yazyk regionalnogo zakonodatelstva: intentsii subyekta dokumentnoy rechi [The Language of Regional Legislation: The Intentions of the Document Speech Subject]. Tula, Tulskoe proizvodstvennoe poligraficheskoe obyedinenie. 208 p.Kireeva E.Z., 2020. K voprosu o soderzhanii i granitsakh subyektivnoy modalnosti [To the Question of Content and Boundaries of Subjective Modality]. Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of Ivanovo State University. Series: Humanities], no. 2, pp. 22-27.Kosova M.V., 2012. Sistemnost kak svoystvo dokumentnogo teksta [Systematics as a Feature of the Document Text]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, no. 1 (15), pp. 7-11.Kosova M.V., 2013. Informativnost dokumentnogo teksta: l ingvisticheskie kriterii mery [Informativity of Document Text: Linguistic Criteria of Measure]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], no. 3 (19), pp. 85-89.Kosova M.V., 2015. Parametry rechevogo zhanra kak model dokumentnogo teksta [Speech Genre Characteristics of the Documentation Text Model]. Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Sovremennaya kommunikativistika [Scientific Research and Development. Modern Communication Studies], vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 16-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/16551Kosova M.V., 2016. Subyektivnost kak komponent modalnosti dokumentnogo teksta [Subjectivity as a Component of Modality in the Document Text]. Kuksa I.Yu., ed. Kategoriya modalnosti v rechevoy kommunikatsii: sb. nauch. tr. [The Categoryof Modalityin Speech Communication: Collection of Research Papers]. Kaliningrad, BFUim. I. Kanta Publ., pp. 162-168.Kosova M.V., Kiyamova S.Kh., 2013. Kategoriya lokalnosti v dokumentnom tekste [ The Category of Locality in a Document Text]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, no. 1 (17), pp. 6-10.Kosova M.V., Kul’ko O.I., 2011. Dokumentnaya lingvistika: dokumentnyy tekst v sovremennom kommunikativnom prostranstve [Documental Linguistics: Document Text in the Modern Communicative Space]. Volgograd, Izd-vo VolGU. 96 p.Kosova M.V., Sheptukhina E.M., 2022. Metodologicheskie polozheniya lingvisticheskoy kontseptsii professora S.P. Lopushanskoy: novye sfery primeneniya [Methodological Provisions of the Linguistic Approach of Professor S. P. Lopushanskaya: New Application Spheres].Dmitrieva E.G., Safonova I.A., eds. Slovo i tekst v sinkhronii i diakhronii: sb. st. k 95-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Sofii Petrovny Lopushanskoy [The Word and the Text in Synchrony and Diachrony: A Collection of Articles Dedicated to the 95th Anniversary of Prof. S.P. Lopushanskaya]. Volgograd, Izd-vo VolGU, pp. 26-48.Krasnova O.N., 2009. Kompozitsionno-rechevaya realizatsiya informativnoy funktsii v nauchnom dokumente [Speech Pattern Realization of the Categoryof Informativity in Scientific Document]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, no. 1 (9), pp. 77-81.Kushneruk S.P., 2002. Sovremennoe sostoyanie dokumentnoy lingvistiki kak napravleniya v yazykovedenii [Documental Linguistics as a Domain of Language Studies: Current State]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, iss. 2, pp. 101-107.Kushneruk S.P., 2007. Lingvistika dokumentnoy kommunikatsii (teoreticheskie aspekty) [Linguistics of Document Communication: Theoretical Aspects]. Volgograd, Volgogr. nauch. izd-vo. 276 p.Kushneruk S.P., 2009. Sovremennyy dokumentnyy tekst: sozdanie i issledovanie [Modern Document Text: Creation and Studying]. Moscow, Liberiya-Bibinform Publ. 192 p.Kuz netsova T. V. , 2002 . Deloproizvodstvo (dokumentatsionnoe obespechenie upravleniya) [Document Management (Documentation Support of Administration)]. Moscow, ZAO Biznes-Shkola Intel-Sintez Publ. 374 p.Lar’kov N.S., 2006. Dokumentovedenie [Document Studies]. Moscow, Vostok-Zapad Publ. 427 p. Leychik V.M., 1990. Osobennosti funktsionirovaniya terminov v tekste [Peculiarities of Terms Functioning in a Text]. Filologicheskie nauki [Philological Sciences], no. 3, pp. 80-87.Nemchenko V.N., 2008. Vvedenie v yazykoznanie [Introduction to Language Studies]. Moscow, Drofa Publ. 703 p.Pligina E.S., 2012. K probleme dokumentnogo statusa PR-teksta [PR Text as a Document]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, no. 2 (16), pp. 146-149.Plotnikova A.M., 2016. Dokumentnyy tekst kak obyekt sudebnoy l ingvisticheskoy i avtorovedcheskoy ekspertizy [Document Text as an Object of Judicial Linguistic and Authorship Examination]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], no. 1 (16), pp. 37-43. DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2016.1.4Plotnikova A.M., 2017. Konfliktnaya kommunikatsiya v aspekte sudebnoy lingvistiki [Conflict Communication in the Frameworks of Forensic Linguistics]. Yekaterinburg, Moscow, TXT Publ. 196 p.Plotnikova A.M., 2018. Naivnaya lingvokreativnost: ot shutki do sudebnogo razbiratelstva. Psikholingvisticheskie aspekty izucheniya rechevoy deyatelnosti [Naive Linguistic Creativity: From a Joke to a Trial]. Psikhologicheskie aspekty izucheniya rechevoy deyatelnosti [Psychological Aspects of Speech Study], iss. 16, pp. 108-116.Polonskiy A.V., 2000. Kategorialnaya i funktsionalnaya sushchnost adresatnosti (na materiale russkogo yazyka v sopostavlenii s polskim): avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk [Categorial and Functional Essence of Addressness (Exemplified by the Russian Language Contrasted with Polish). Dr. philol. sci. abs. diss.]. Orel. 40 р.Preferansov S.A., 2011. Knizhnaya i razgovornayaleksika v dokumentakh Tsaritsynskogo gorodovogo magistrata (1784–1799 gg.) [Written and Spoken Lexics in Official Document of Tsaritsin Town Council (1784–1799)]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, no. 1 (13), pp. 58-64.Romanova N.A., Kosova M.V., 2022. Adaptirovannyi tekst v sovremennoi spetsialnoy kommunikatsii: ponyatie, vidy, svoystva [Adapted Text in Modern Special Communication: Concept, Types, Properties]. PRIMOASPECTU, no. 4 (52), pp. 6168. DOI: 10.35211/2500-2635-2022-4-52-61-68Romashova O.V., Romanova N.A., 2020. Lingvisticheskaya reprezentatsiya patsient-orientirovannogo podkhoda v lechebnom protsesse (na materiale klinicheskikh rekomendatsiy) [Linguistic Representation of the Patient-Oriented Approach in the Treatment Process (Based on Clinical Recommendations)]. Tulskiy nauchnyy vestnik. Seriya: Istoriya, yazykoznanie [Tula Scientific Bulletin. History. Linguistics], iss. 2 (2), pp. 95-107.Saidgasanova E.U., 2014. Dokumentnaya kommunikatsiya kak vid sotsialnoy kommunikatsii [Document Communication as a Form of Social Communication]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], no. 3 (22), pp. 105-109. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2014.3.13Sharipova R.R., 2014. Kompozitsionno-rechevaya organizatsiya reglamenta kak reguliruyushchego dokumenta [The Compositional and Speech Organization of Regulation Text as a Regulatory Document]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], no. 2 (21), pp. 8289. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2. 2014.2.11Sheptukhina E.M., 2019. Zhanrovye parametryskazki kak dokumenta serediny XVIII veka v aspekte sozdaniya lingvisticheskogo korpusa [Genre Parameters of a Narrating as a Document of the Mid-18th Century in the Aspect of Creating a Linguistic Corps]. Nauchnyy dialog [Scientific Dialogue], no. 11, pp. 114-129. DOI: 10.24224/ 2227-1295-2019-11-114-129Sheptukhina E.M., 2020. Zhanrovaya parametrizatsiya raspisok serediny XVIII veka (na materiale arkhivnogo fonda Mikhaylovskogo stanichnogo atamana) [Genre Parametrization of Receipt in the Middle 18th Century (With Reference to “Mikhailovsky Stanitsa Ataman” Archive)]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 74-86. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.5.7Shirinkina M.A., 2020. Informatsionnyy tip dokumentov ispolnitelnoy vlasti: problemy vydeleniya i opisaniya [Information Documents of Executives: Problems of Identification and Description]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 157-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/ jvolsu2.2020.4.14Shirinkina M.A., 2021. Formaty i zhanry mediakommunikatsii ispolnitelnoy vlasti [Formats and Genres of Media Communication of the Executive Power]. Zhanry rechi [Speech Genres], no. 1 (29), рр. 66-77. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2021-1-29-66-77Sologub O.P., 2016a. Binarnye klishirovannye slovosochetaniya ofitsialno-delovoy rechi [Binary Clishéd Phrases of Official Business Language]. Bolgarskaya rusistika, no. 2, pp. 18-29.Sologub O.P., 2016b. Ofitsialnost kak organizuyushchee nachalo dokumentnoy kommunikatsii [Officiality as an Organizing Principle of Official Business Communication]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], no. 1 (30), pp. 18-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2016.1.2Tokarev G.V., 2016. Dokumentnyyi khudozhestvennyy tekstyvaspekte realizatsii ikh priznakov[Features of Document and Literary Texts]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], no. 1 (30), pp. 77-81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/ jvolsu2.2016.1.9Tokarev G.V., 2019. Diskursivnye osobennosti lichnogo dnevnika kak kamernogo dokumenta [Private Diary as a Chamber Document: Discourse Peculiarities]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 48-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/ jvolsu2.2019.2.5Tupikova N.A., Preferansov S.A., 2011. Strukturno-funktsionalnye svoystva dokumentov v sostave arkhivnogo fonda tsaritsynskogo gorodovogo magistrata [Structural and Functional Peculiarities of the Documents That Comprise the Archive Fund of Tsaritsin City Council]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Philology. Art Studies], no. 28 (243), pp. 106-108.Tyurikova N.A., 2013. Ekstra- i intralingvisticheskie prichiny izmeneniy v terminologii [Extra- and Intralinguistic Reasons of Changes in Dynamic Terminologies]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, no. 1 (17), pp. 126-129. Valgina N.S., 2003. Teoriya teksta [Text Theory]. Moscow, Logos Publ. 191 p.Yankovaya V.F., 2001. Delovoystil (o spetsifike yazyka upravlencheskikh dokumentov) [Business-Letter Style. On the Peculiarities of the Language of Administrative Documents]. Sekretarskoe delo, no. 4 (25), pp. 17-22.Yankovaya V.F., 2017. Ponyatie i priznaki dokumenta [The Concept and the Features of the Document]. Otechestvennye arkhivy [Domestic Archives], no. 2, pp. 16-23.Yankovaya V.F., 2022. O podkhode k klassifikatsii dokumentnykh sistem i dokumentov [On the Approach to Classifying Documentation Systems and Documents]. Deloproizvodstvo, no. 3, pp. 5-12.