<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2. Языкознание</journal-title></journal-title-group><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">1998-9911</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="eissn">2409-1979</journal-id></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15688/jvolsu2.2024.4.7</article-id><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Антислова как фактор идеологизации современного политического дискурса Германии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Un-Words as a Factor of Ideologization in the Modern German Political Discourse</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Гусейнова</surname><given-names>Иннара Алиевна</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гусейнова</surname><given-names>Иннара Алиевна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Guseynova</surname><given-names>Innara</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>ginnap@mail.ru</email><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-6544-699X</contrib-id></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Горожанов</surname><given-names>Алексей Иванович</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Горожанов</surname><given-names>Алексей Иванович</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gorozhanov</surname><given-names>Alexey</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>a_gorozhanov@mail.ru</email><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-2280-1282</contrib-id></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow State Linguistic University (Moscow, Russian Federation)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московский государственный лингвистический университет (Москва, Российская Федерация)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2024-08-21"><day>21</day><month>08</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>84</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-02-06"><day>06</day><month>02</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2024-05-13"><day>13</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><license><license-p xml:lang="ru">CC BY 4.0</license-p></license></permissions><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье предпринята попытка установить содержательный компонент немецких антислов, вошедших в последнее время в современный политический дискурс ФРГ, представленный корпусом текстов федеральных и региональных СМИ, формирующих негативную повестку дня, с точки зрения трудностей, которые они представляют для интерпретации читателем. К таковым относятся: проблема терминологической амбисемии, неологизмы, представляющие собой многокомпонентные слова, оценочная лексика, содержащая негативные коннотации по отношению к представителям иных культур, имеющих мигрантское происхождение, а также крылатые слова и выражения, включающие ретрокомпонент. Рассмотрены лексемы Remigration, Heizungs-Stasi, Doppelwumms, Kriegstьchtigkeit, Gamechanger, Sondervermцgen, Stolzmonat, Technologieoffenheit, Klimakleber и др. В исследовании применены лексико-семантический метод с элементами дискурсивного и контент-анализа, контекстуальный анализ, а также элементы словообразовательного анализа. Такое сложное сочетание различных методов обусловлено тем, что изучаемые языковые единицы не зафиксированы в лексикографических источниках, словарях глоссарного типа и справочной литературе. Установлено, что наиболее популярными темами, формирующими негативную повестку дня, выступают проблема миграции, экологические и эколого-социальные проблемы, связанные со снижением уровня жизни граждан Германии, неудачные высказывания политической элиты, содержащие влияющие на реализацию внутренней и внешней политики Германии.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The research attempts to establish the content component of un-words that have recently entered the modern political discourse of Germany, represented by a corpus of texts from federal and regional media that form a negative agenda, from the point of view of the difficulties they present for their interpretation by the reader. These include: the problem of terminological ambisemy, neologisms that are multi-component words, evaluative vocabulary containing negative connotations in relation to representatives of other cultures of migrant origin, as well as catchwords and expressions that include a retro component. The lexemes Remigration, Heizungs-Stasi, Doppelwumms, Kriegstьchtigkeit, Gamechanger, Sondervermцgen, Stolzmonat, Technologieoffenheit, Klimakleber, etc. have been examined. The lexical-semantic method with elements of discourse and content analysis, contextual analysis, as well as elements of word-formation analysis were used during the study. Such a complex combination of various methods is due to the fact that the analyzed language units are not recorded in lexicographic sources, glossary dictionaries and reference literature. It was stated that the most popular topics that form a negative agenda are the problem of migration, environmental and environmental-social problems associated with a decrease in the standard of living of German citizens, unsuccessful rhetoric of the political elite containing statements that affect the implementation of Germany’s internal and foreign policy.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>политический дискурс</kwd><kwd>Германия</kwd><kwd>антислово</kwd><kwd>межъязыковая коммуникация</kwd><kwd>межкультурная коммуникация</kwd><kwd>идеологический компонент</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>un-word</kwd><kwd>political discourse</kwd><kwd>Germany</kwd><kwd>interlingual communication</kwd><kwd>intercultural communication</kwd><kwd>ideological component</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ankin D.Yu., Mityagina V.A., 2023. Lingvopragmaticheskaya kharakteristika samoprezentatsionnogo diskursa (na materiale kontenta angloyazychnykh korporativnykh saitov) [Linguistic and Pragmatic Characteristics of Self-Presentational Discourse (Based on the Material of the Content of English-Language Corporate Websites)]. Aktualnye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki [Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics], no. 4, pp. 157-168. DOI 10.29025/2079-6021-2023-4-157-168</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Babenko N.S., 2023. Grammaticheskii stroi nemetskogo yazyka s pozitsii konstruirovaniya idioetnichnosti ego svoistv [Grammatical Structure of German Language from the Perspective of Constructing the Idioethnicity of its Properties]. Russkaya germanistika: Ezhegodnik Rossiiskogo soyuza germanistov [Yearbook of the Russian Union of Germanists], vol. 20, pp. 15-39. DOI: 10.47388/2782-2605/lunn2023-20-15-39</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baranov A., Dobrovolskiy D., 2023. Principles of Describing Obscene Idioms. Russian Linguistics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11185-022-09266-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belyakov D.A., Eliseeva U.V., Bodryagina A.D., 2020. K voprosu o leksike sotsialnykh setei v sovremennom nemetskom yazyke [On the Vocabulary of Social Networks in the Modern German Language]. Naukosfera, no. 11-1, pp. 174-182.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Doynikova M.I., 2022. Osnovnye tendentsii v izmenenii obshchego slovarya nemetskogo yazyka [Main Trends in Changes to the General Word-Stock of the German Language]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Philology. Theory &amp; Practice], vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 464-468. DOI: 10.30853/phil20220053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grigoryeva L.N., 2021. Sravnitelnyy lingvokulturologicheskiy analiz nemetsko- i russkoyazychnykh slov i antislov goda [Comparative Culture Linguistics Analysis of German and Russian Words and Un-Words of the Year]. Nemetskaya filologiya v Sankt-Peterburgskom gosudarstvennom universitete: sb. nauch. st. [German Philology at St. Petersburg State University: Collection of Research Articles], iss. XI. Saint Petersburg, Izd-vo SPbGU, pp. 15-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guseynova I.A., Gorozhanov A.I., 2023. Novye podkhody k perevodcheskoy teorii i praktike (iz opyta sozdaniya uchebnogo posobiya «osnovy praktiki pismennogo perevoda s nemetskogo yazyka na russkiy yazyk») [New Approaches to Translation Theory and Practice (From the Experience of Creating an Exercise Book “Foundations of Written Translation Practice from German into Russian Language”)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Seriya 22. Teoriya perevoda [Lomonosov Translation Studies Jounal, No. 22 Translation Studies], vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 7-24. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2074-6636-22-2023-16-2-7-24</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kalinin O.I., Prikhod’ko M.V., 2023. Kontent-analiz kak metod issledovaniya informatsionnoy voiny (na materiale reprezentatsii kitaisko-amerikanskoy torgovoy voiny v mediadiskurse KNR i SShA) [Content Analysis as a Method of Information War Research (Based on the Representation of the Sino-American Trade War in the Media Discourse of the PRC and the USA)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki [Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities], no. 12 (880), pp. 39-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karasik V.I., 2004. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost, kontsepty, diskurs [Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ. 392 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karasik V.I., 2023. Diskursivnye emblemy kak obyekt semioticheskogo analiza [Discourse Emblems as the Object of Semiotic Analysis]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika [RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics], vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1122-1138. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2023-14-4-1122-1138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kraeva I.A., Lapteva N.E., Bud’ko A.F. et al., 2022. Germanistika i lingvodidaktika v Moskovskom i Minskom gosudarstvennykh lingvisticheskikh universitetakh: istoki, razvitie, perspektivy [Germanistics and Linguodidactics at Moscow and Minsk State Linguistic Universities: Origins, Development, Prospects]. Kazan, Buk Publ. 286 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Manik S.A., 2023. Sovremennaya leksikografiya v epokhu CHAT GPT [Contemporary Lexicography in CHAT GPT Era]. Nauchno-issledovatelskaya deyatelnost v klassicheskom universitete – 2023: traditsii i innovatsii: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. fest., Ivanovo, 10–28 aprelya 2023 g. [Research Activities in a Classical University – 2023: Traditions and Innovations: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Festival, Ivanovo, April 10–28, 2023]. Ivanovo, Ivan. gos. un-t, pp. 519-524.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nefedova L.A., Kustova A.M., 2021. «Antislovo» goda kak osobyy vid lingvisticheskoy refleksii v Germanii i Avstrii [Un-Words of the Year as Special Type of Linguistic Self-Reflection in Germany and Austria]. Studia Germanica, Romanica et Comparatistica, vol. 17, no. 1 (51), pp. 45-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schlosser Н.D., 2007. Unwцrter des Jahres – Sprachkritik zwischen Linguistik und Politik. Reimann S., Kessel K., Hrsg. Wissenschaften in Kontakt. Kooperationsfelder der Deutschen Sprachwissenschaft. Tьbingen, S. 288-297.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Syt’ko A.V., 2023. Deonticheskoe vyskazyvanie: semanticheskie kharakteristiki i pragmaticheskii potentsial na materiale russkogo i nemetskogo yazykov [Deontic Statements: Semantic Characteristics and Pragmatic Potential in Russian and German Languages]. Minsk, Minsk. gos. lingvist. un-t. 247 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Titkova O.I., 2014. Rekurrentnye yazykovye edinitsy v institutsionalnoy kommunikatsii [Recurrent Language Units in Institutional Communication]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University], no. 9 (695), pp. 173-182.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Urtaeva E.B., 2024. Kommunikatsionnaya politika v interesakh sovremennogo rossiyskogo gosudarstva [Communication Policy in the Interests of the Modern Russian State]. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: ekonomika i upravlenie [Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration], vol. 13, no. 1 (46), pp. 199-204.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vinogradov V.V., 1938. Ocherki po istorii russkogo literaturnogo yazyka XVII–XIX vekov [Essays on the History of the Russian Literary Language of the 17th – 19th Centuries]. Moscow, Uchpedgiz Publ. 528 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
