Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 2. Языкознание1998-99112409-197910.15688/jvolsu2.2025.1.5OtherВербализация поведенческого аспекта лингвофилософской категории «отношения» в итальянском и английском языкахVerbalization of the Behavioral Aspect of the Linguo-Philosophical Category of “Relations” in Italian and English LanguagesСавватееваИрина АнатольевнаSavvateevaIrinasavvrina@mail.ru0009-0004-5995-9934Irkutsk National Research Technical University (Irkutsk , Russian Federation)Иркутский национальный исследовательский технический университет (Иркутск, Российская Федерация)2404202524152631402202421102024https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/CC BY 4.0https://l.jvolsu.com/index.php/ru/archive-ru/947-science-journal-of-volsu-linguistics-2025-vol-24-no-1/mezhkulturnaya-kommunikatsiya-i-sopostavitelnoe-izuchenie-yazykov/2905-savvateeva-i-a-verbalizatsiya-povedencheskogo-aspekta-lingvofilosofskoj-kategorii-otnosheniya-v-italyanskom-i-anglijskom-yazykakh-na-angl-yaz

The article is dedicated to the issue of reflecting human relations in a behavioral aspect in different languages. It presents the results of a comparative analysis of the semantic organization of meanings of conceptually related lexical units that share a common Latin root and verbalize the category of RELATIONS in Italian and English. Based on a detailed analysis of the nouns atteggiamento in Italian and attitude in English, conducted with consideration of the linguocognitive and linguocultural contexts, the semantic similarities and differences of these lexemes are identified. Both units denote an evaluation (positive or negative) in relation to certain circumstances. However, the Italian word emphasizes the awareness of external actions, while the English word refers to a reaction more associated with internal emotions and mental states. The analyzed lexemes atteggiamento and attitude demonstrate a tendency towards the dominance of the behavioral component in the semantics of the category of RELATIONS due to the actualization of diachronic components in their lexical meanings. The prospects for the research lie in the application of a comprehensive comparative methodology for a deeper study on evoluting meanings of lexical units that explicate the semiotic and axiological aspects of the category of RELATIONS in Italian and English.

Исследование посвящено актуальной проблеме отражения в разных языках представлений их носителей об отношениях людей в поведенческом аспекте. В статье изложены результаты сопоставительного анализа семантической организации значений понятийно близких лексических единиц, имеющих общий латинский корень и вербализующих категорию «отношения» в итальянском и английском языках. На основе детального анализа существительных atteggiamento в итальянском языке и attitude в английском, проведенного с учетом лингвокогнитивного и лингвокультурного контекстов, выявлены семантические общность и различия этих лексем. Обе единицы обозначают оценку (позитивную или негативную) по отношению к определенным обстоятельствам, при этом итальянское слово акцентирует осознание внешних действий, а английское слово номинирует реакцию, больше связанную с внутренними эмоциями и психическим состоянием. Проанализированные лексемы atteggiamento и attitude демонстрируют тенденцию к доминированию поведенческого компонента в семантике категории «отношения» благодаря актуализации диахронических компонентов в их лексических значениях. Перспективы исследования видятся в применении комплексной сопоставительной методики для углубленного изучения эволюции значений лексических единиц, которые эксплицируют семиотические и аксиологические аспекты категории «отношения» в итальянском и английском языках.

лексико-семантическая сферадиахронический анализвербализациялингвокогнитивный аспектлингвокультурный аспектязыковая картина миралингвофилософская категория «отношения»linguo-philosophical category of RELATIONSlexico-semantic spherediachronic analysisverbalizationlinguocognitive aspectlinguocultural aspectlinguistic worldviewAjzen I., 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TAjzen I., 2020. The Theory of Planned Behavior: Frequently Asked Questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 314-324. DOI: 10.1002/hbe2.195Amin A., 2020. Attitude Towards Language in Sociolinguistics Settings: A Brief Overview. Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v2i1.3758Albarracin D., Shavitt S., 2018. Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual Review of Psychology, no. 69, pp. 299-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911Anastasi A., 2001. Differencialnaja psihologija. Individualnye i gruppovye razlichija v povedenii [Differential Psychology. Individual and Group Differences in Behavior]. Moscow, April Press. 752 p.Bicudo E., 2023. Cognitive Foundations of Society: The Concept of Schemata in Cell, Gene, and Tissue Therapies. Applied Linguistics, vol. 44, no. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad084Blumberg K., 2023. Attitudes, Presuppositions, and the Binding Theory. Journal of Semantics, vol. 40, no. 2-3, pp. 265-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffad007Bradford-Knox R., 2020. Towards a Risk Based Cooperative and Collaborative Culture – The Attitudinal Elements and Influences That Shape Our Behaviour and Public Opinion. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 496-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.74.20-035De Houwer J., Van Dessel P., Moran T., 2021. Attitudes as Propositional Representations. Trends Cognitive Science, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 870-882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.003Dragojevic M., Fasoli F., Cramer J., Rakiж T., 2021. Toward a Century of Language Attitudes Research: Looking Back and Moving Forward. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 60-79. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0261927X20966714Eagly A.H., Chaiken S., 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. New York, Harcourt, Brace, & Janovich. 794 p.Fleck C., 2015. Attitude: History of Concept. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. In 25 Vols. Oxford, Elsevier, vol. 2, pp. 175-177. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03146-9Gaiseanu F., 2020. Attitude as an Expressible Info-Operational Reaction to a Perceived/Purposed Object/Objective. International Journal on Neuropsychology and Behavioural Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12-16. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.51626/ijnbs.2020.01.00002Ivanova R.P., Verkhoturova T.L., 2022. Kognitivno-semioticheskiy analiz leksiki zritelnoy pertseptii v yakutskom yazyke [Cognitive-Semiotic Analysis of Visual Perception Vocabulary in the Sakha Language]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], no. 6 (224), pp. 45-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2022-6-45-51Prandi M., 2023. Un frammento di metafisica descrittiva: i presupposti dell’atteggiamento natural. Materiali di Estetica, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 191-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54103/mde.i10.2.22096Savvateeva I.A., 2023. Sravnitelnyi definitsionnyi analiz kontsepta BEHAVIOUR i smezhnykh s nim poniatii [Comparative Definitional Analysis of the Concept Behavior and Related concepts]. Modern Humanity Success, no. 3, pp.150-153.Schmid S.M., Gьlsen Y., 2021. Lexical Access in L1 Attrition – Competition Versus Frequency: A Comparison of Turkish and Moroccan Attriters in the Netherlands. Applied Linguistics, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 878-904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab006Shamne N.L., 2003. Mezhkulturnaia i transkulturnaia kommunikatsiia: k opredeleniiu poniatii [Intercultural and Transcultural Communication: Towards the Definition of Concepts]. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, no. 3, pp. 73-80.Shamne N.L., Rebrina L.N., 2013. Lingvisticheskaja proekcija kategorii pamjati [Linguistic Projection of Category Memory]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 19, no. 3, pp.104-112.Shaposhnikova I.V., 2020. Obraz mira cheloveka i semanticheskoe uporjadochenie leksiki v mezhdisciplinarnoj lingvistike [Image of the Human World and Semantic Organization of Lexicon in Interdisciplinary Linguistics]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 155-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.5.14Sinha C. 2021. Culture in Language and Cognition. Chapter 37. Wen Xu, Taylor J.R., eds. The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York, Routledge, pp. 387-407.CDO – Cambridge Dictionary. URL:http://dictionary.cambridge.orgCollins – Collins Online Dictionary. URL: http://www. collinsdictionary.comMWD – Merriam-Webster Dictionary. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.comOED – Online Etymology Dictionary. URL: https://www.etymonline.com/word/attitudeOLD – Oxford Learners Dictionary. URL: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.comTreccani – Treccani Vocabulario. URL: https://www.treccani.itVI – Il vocabulario Italiano. URL: https://unaparolaalgiorno.it/significato/attitudineBNC – British National Corpus. URL: https://www.english-corpora.orgGlosbe – Glosbe. Online Dictionary. URL: http://www. glosbe.comPAISА – Piattaforma per l’Apprendimento dell’Italiano Su corpora Annotati. URL: https://www. corpusitaliano.it/it/index.htmlAjzen I., 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TAjzen I., 2020. The Theory of Planned Behavior: Frequently Asked Questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 314-324. DOI: 10.1002/hbe2.195Amin A., 2020. Attitude Towards Language in Sociolinguistics Settings: A Brief Overview. Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v2i1.3758Albarracin D., Shavitt S., 2018. Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual Review of Psychology, no. 69, pp. 299-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911Anastasi A., 2001. Differencialnaja psihologija. Individualnye i gruppovye razlichija v povedenii [Differential Psychology. Individual and Group Differences in Behavior]. Moscow, April Press. 752 p.Bicudo E., 2023. Cognitive Foundations of Society: The Concept of Schemata in Cell, Gene, and Tissue Therapies. Applied Linguistics, vol. 44, no. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad084Blumberg K., 2023. Attitudes, Presuppositions, and the Binding Theory. Journal of Semantics, vol. 40, no. 2-3, pp. 265-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffad007Bradford-Knox R., 2020. Towards a Risk Based Cooperative and Collaborative Culture – The Attitudinal Elements and Influences That Shape Our Behaviour and Public Opinion. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 496-506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.74.20-035De Houwer J., Van Dessel P., Moran T., 2021. Attitudes as Propositional Representations. Trends Cognitive Science, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 870-882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.003Dragojevic M., Fasoli F., Cramer J., Rakiж T., 2021. Toward a Century of Language Attitudes Research: Looking Back and Moving Forward. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 60-79. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0261927X20966714Eagly A.H., Chaiken S., 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. New York, Harcourt, Brace, & Janovich. 794 p.Fleck C., 2015. Attitude: History of Concept. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. In 25 Vols. Oxford, Elsevier, vol. 2, pp. 175-177. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03146-9Gaiseanu F., 2020. Attitude as an Expressible Info-Operational Reaction to a Perceived/Purposed Object/Objective. International Journal on Neuropsychology and Behavioural Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12-16. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.51626/ijnbs.2020.01.00002Ivanova R.P., Verkhoturova T.L., 2022. Kognitivno-semioticheskiy analiz leksiki zritelnoy pertseptii v yakutskom yazyke [Cognitive-Semiotic Analysis of Visual Perception Vocabulary in the Sakha Language]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], no. 6 (224), pp. 45-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2022-6-45-51Prandi M., 2023. Un frammento di metafisica descrittiva: i presupposti dell’atteggiamento natural. Materiali di Estetica, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 191-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54103/mde.i10.2.22096Savvateeva I.A., 2023. Sravnitelnyi definitsionnyi analiz kontsepta BEHAVIOUR i smezhnykh s nim poniatii [Comparative Definitional Analysis of the Concept Behavior and Related concepts]. Modern Humanity Success, no. 3, pp.150-153.Schmid S.M., Gьlsen Y., 2021. Lexical Access in L1 Attrition – Competition Versus Frequency: A Comparison of Turkish and Moroccan Attriters in the Netherlands. Applied Linguistics, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 878-904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab006Shamne N.L., 2003. Mezhkulturnaia i transkulturnaia kommunikatsiia: k opredeleniiu poniatii [Intercultural and Transcultural Communication: Towards the Definition of Concepts]. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, no. 3, pp. 73-80.Shamne N.L., Rebrina L.N., 2013. Lingvisticheskaja proekcija kategorii pamjati [Linguistic Projection of Category Memory]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 19, no. 3, pp.104-112.Shaposhnikova I.V., 2020. Obraz mira cheloveka i semanticheskoe uporjadochenie leksiki v mezhdisciplinarnoj lingvistike [Image of the Human World and Semantic Organization of Lexicon in Interdisciplinary Linguistics]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 155-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.5.14Sinha C. 2021. Culture in Language and Cognition. Chapter 37. Wen Xu, Taylor J.R., eds. The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York, Routledge, pp. 387-407.CDO – Cambridge Dictionary. URL:http://dictionary.cambridge.orgCollins – Collins Online Dictionary. URL: http://www. collinsdictionary.comMWD – Merriam-Webster Dictionary. URL: https://www.merriam-webster.comOED – Online Etymology Dictionary. URL: https://www.etymonline.com/word/attitudeOLD – Oxford Learners Dictionary. URL: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.comTreccani – Treccani Vocabulario. URL: https://www.treccani.itVI – Il vocabulario Italiano. URL: https://unaparolaalgiorno.it/significato/attitudineBNC – British National Corpus. URL: https://www.english-corpora.orgGlosbe – Glosbe. Online Dictionary. URL: http://www. glosbe.comPAISА – Piattaforma per l’Apprendimento dell’Italiano Su corpora Annotati. URL: https://www. corpusitaliano.it/it/index.html